OT and ICS Cybersecurity Assessment

Service scope

• Interviews, document review, configuration sampling, and control observation
• Assessment of architecture, identity, networks, endpoints, backups, and security processes
• Finding validation with control owners and context-aware risk rating

Practical deliverables

• Executive posture report and key risks
• Technical findings with evidence and corrective actions
• Prioritized roadmap with owners, schedule, and closure criteria

Evidence, not checklist scoring

Assessment starts by defining scope, asset ownership, critical processes, and rules of engagement. Interviews, document review, control observation, configuration sampling, and architecture analysis are connected to expose the gap between written policy and actual operation.

Findings record evidence, affected assets, threat scenarios, consequences, and existing controls. In OT, active testing is performed only with authorization, safety analysis, and rollback; an assessment must not add operational risk merely to prove a weakness.

From findings to a remediation roadmap

Remediation priority combines asset criticality, realistic exploitability, safety and production consequence, current-control effectiveness, and change complexity. Outputs must support executive decisions and remain executable by technical teams.

Related guidance and services

Evidence-based OT/ICS cybersecurity assessment covering assets, architecture, configuration, access, process, risk, and a safety-aware remediation roadmap.